The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails gng and pornbio. Being interviewed is primary and doesnt count. Being a columnist doesnt count unless someone writes about your content and being nominated does not count anymore
SpartazHumbug! 21:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Article easily meets both
WP:GNG and
WP:PORNBIO. It is well sourced. The nomination for AFD is questionable.
MarnetteD|
Talk 21:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)reply
This AfD his hardly questionable. I'm undecided, but the subject fails PORNBIO with only award nominations. Several of the porn trade sources appear to be republished press releases. However, notability per
WP:CREATIVE may be claimed.
• Gene93k (
talk) 18:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. The article clearly details that she is more than just a performer. For starters, she co-founded several notable companies, some of which have either won awards for their films (
Sweetheart Video,
Sweet Sinner) or have won awards themselves as a company (
Girl Candy Films). Also, "being a columnist doesn't count unless someone writes about your content"...is this a guideline? Erpertblah, blah, blah... 03:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The relevant [
guideline doesn't give credit for being a published columnist
SpartazHumbug! 20:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
So you mentioned a guideline that doesn't prove your point? Anyway, point #3 of that guideline clearly states: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work", which she indeed passes. Erpertblah, blah, blah... 21:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - per argument by Erpert and MarnetteD. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 17:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.