The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Joyous! |
Talk 01:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)reply
fails WP:BIO. article is poorly sourced and gnews yields only 1 or 2 sources. There are also very few articles that link to this.
LibStar (
talk) 05:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete does not pass any of the notability criteria for academics.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.