The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I find no coverage applicable to establishing
notability. At best, the website is cited in a few places as the source for information related elsewhere. The references in the article are almost exclusively to the website the article is about. There are also no Google hits for the stated parent company, INpact MediaGroup (
"inpact mediagroup",
"inpact media group").
Largoplazo (
talk)
21:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)reply
It has five sources, but the first is their own website. The second includes it in one row of a long table of websites. The third source was co-produced by INpact. Based on what I can see of the fourth and fifth—there's a paywall—they may qualify, but they're by the same writer in the same publication, Le Figaro, so I think it counts as one source.
Largoplazo (
talk)
00:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Thanks for clarification, your reasoning makes sense. I immediately disregarded the first source, but was not sure about the other four. I'll comment "delete" below.
Anton.bersh (
talk)
13:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.