The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Should be draftified. A single source, which the article's author says is not
WP:RS because it gets other basic facts wrong, is not enough to base an article on. Found no other RS to supplement or further establish notability with GNG. A national arena league team does not have presumed notability per any SNG. There is
WP:NODEADLINE - we can wait to have an article on this team until notability is more clearly established. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
22:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment The press conference was this morning, a second article was just released
here, meaning it now has multiple independent refs that may meet
WP:GNG. I am not the author, but I published to keep the original author's contributions (because someone was bound to create it after the press conference, and I felt the proper attribution to the edit history should be preserved.). As to RS, the publisher of that article (
New York Daily News) was there to show independent coverage. My comment about basic facts was they did not do their homework (stating a team in the league is in Columbus, Ohio, when it is actually in Columbus, Georgia) and is a pretty typical error for independent coverage (meaning, for once, this team was covered by a publisher that is not a blog). Otherwise I do not care if this is kept, drafted, or deleted. I was just trying to give proper creation to the editor before someone made a new page.
Yosemiter (
talk)
23:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Draftify Clearly fails
WP:GNG through a before search (only the NYDN article seems like it would pass, MAYBE one from Newsday), and if it passes GNG it probably still fails NOTNEWS. That being said, the article likely will be notable in the near future. Let's incubate it.
SportingFlyertalk05:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Draftify currently doesn't meet requirements, but likely will in the future, so lets incubate it to allow for improvements until then --
DannyS712 (
talk)
10:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.