The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 05:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)reply
WP:BLP of an actor, making no substantive claim of notability per
WP:NACTOR as all of his listed roles to date have been as supporting or one-off guest characters. This is referenced only to a single news article about something else, in which he's briefly namechecked as a provider of soundbite but fails to be the subject of the article, so it doesn't pass
WP:GNG either. Possibly just
WP:TOOSOON. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when there's more substance and better sourcing to be had.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Subject lacks notability at this time and is only mentioned in passing in reference provided. As Bearcat noted, it may just be too early.
Meatsgains (
talk) 00:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom - I am unable to find coverage to demonstrate that subject meets
WP:GNG; roles to date do not appear to meet
WP:ENT. Gongshow talk 16:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator and above commentators.
NewYorkActuary (
talk) 20:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.