The result was keep. In a vote, this would be closed as no consensus; however, after examining the arguments presented by each side, reading the article, and preforming a Google search, I've determined that the subject is notable enough to warrant inclusion within Wikipedia. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Almost complete WP:BOLLOCKS, this article is essentially about obscure ideas that have not received the notice of third-party independent sources. The books that are used as "references" are simply books about psychic communication with your baby or regression psychoanalysis. No need for this kooky article: we can include the "information" elsewhere. ScienceApologist ( talk) 05:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC) reply