The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 01:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Nazo Dharejo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. Has not been elected to any office. Need more independent sources for establishing notability. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC) reply

AKS I have provided the newspapers refernces for Nazo Dharejo , so go through those references and find news about Nazo dharejo, there are required references so the article should not be deleted. Jogi 007 ( talk) 07:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR ( talk) 09:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC) reply

• I'm going to admit right off the top that this is a very badly written article in need of a major quality overhaul — but it does make a notability claim that's tied in some way to the Sindh Assembly. Given the bad quality of writing, I'm not at all clear on whether she sits in that body, or was merely a candidate for a seat that she didn't actually get elected or appointed to — clarifying that properly would be the pivotal difference between a keep or a delete here. Keep and flag for cleanup if she can be properly confirmed as having held a seat in the Sindh Assembly — but delete if she was just an unsuccessful candidate, as the article makes no other genuinely substantive claim of notability for anything else besides that. Bearcat ( talk) 19:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC) reply
• Comment. The article is terribly written, but if I'm reading this reference correctly, she was selected to a reserved seat in the National Assembly. A quick search for additional sources got this profile in The Express Tribune. There is something to this person. GNG? Not there yet. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:46, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply

You are reading it wrong. She was selected as a proposed candidate by the PML-N political party in 2013. -- Bejnar ( talk) 20:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC) reply

• Comment. This source talks only about candidature. No record of her ever being elected. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete as she fails WP:Politician, she was not elected, see list of those elected for the Fourteenth Assembly of the Sindh Assembly from the Pakistan Muslim League (N), aka PML-N, here. Note that in the Sindh Assembly the PML (N) is a small minoroity party, as opposed to its country-wide status. In any event, the article is too soon, since she has no significant coverage aside from the one profile in the Express-Tribune, basically the rest are just mentions. The article also appears to contain original research. Note: Sorath Thebo ( profile) holds the only reserved seat for women for the PML-N in the Sindh Assembly. See also the June 2013 PML-N list of members in the Sindh Assembly. -- Bejnar ( talk) 20:00, 10 September 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nominator. No demonstration that WP:NPOL has been met. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 23:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete fails WP:NPOL, unelected candidate with only routine campaign coverage Kraxler ( talk) 15:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.