The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was procedural close. The mainspace page ceased to exist. The discussion has been mooted by the obligatory redraftification of the page as a reversal of
WP:PAGEMOVEVANDALism which had been done as a form of
WP:VANDTYPES#Gaming the system to evade the requirement to edit DS/CTOP articles likely involving sockpuppetry as noted in the block log. A discussion about content can be continued on the draft's talk page.
(non-admin closure) —
Alalch E.21:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete.
WP:SYNTH, one of several recent
WP:SOAPBOX style articles created in response to the Israel–Hamas war. The idea that there's a notable Nazi movement in Palestinian society gives the impression of
WP:FRINGE. And while this isn't an AfD thing, it's worth noting that this particular article was created by a non-EC editor who became active almost immediately after the war began.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
16:35, 24 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment: This was sensibly moved to draft and then also immediately moved back to mainspace by an EC but otherwise very new user. This should have stayed in draft, bare minimum, until the issued raised on the talk page were addressed. As a mainspace article, the response should be speedy delete it. The alternative would be to speedy re-draft it, but this time with page move protections to stop these shenaningans being repeating.
Iskandar323 (
talk)
17:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Nominator Comment: Having taken a further look at the article I am increasingly certain that
WP:SYNTH is present. I am concerned, too, about the timing of this article. It appears to me to be a thinly disguised disparagement of people of a particular ethnicity, an
attack page albeit a reasonably sophisticated one. Propaganda. 🇺🇦
FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦
19:58, 24 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: The article is largely an essay presenting the author's
point of view. There is probably some encyclopedic material, but this is at the point where
it should be blown up and possibly started over, or possibly not started over.
Delete: Per others, seems like a collection of random events and quite obviously created in response to the recent war. Also created by a non-ECP editor in violation of editing restrictions. Not convinced of notability either, and seems a bit of a fringe view.
ARandomName123 (
talk)Ping me!20:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.