The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete it's rife with promo and no indication this individual is notable. The handful of YouTube videos are worthless as sources and the rest are run of the mill announcements.
Praxidicae (
talk)
13:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Administrator note I have
semi-protected this AfD for four days in response to excessive IP hopping and sockpuppetry. Please note that AfD is not a vote and that mere popularity and majority does not rule; comments should explain why the page should be kept or deleted, referencing policy as needed, and decisions are made through
consensus, not voting. —
k6ka🍁 (
Talk ·
Contributions)
15:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - This is a mess. Fails GNG something fierce, no proper refs... six youtube videos and a handful of fairly irrelevant announcements/press releases do not a wikipedia article make. -- a they/them |
argue |
contribs00:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete - Subject of article lacks significant coverage in reliable press. The presence of Sock-puppets in this AFD shows you one or more contributors to the creation of this article are
WP:NOTHERE to build encyclopedia.
Celestina007 (
talk)
17:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.