The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Article needs some serious work (NPOV, references, refactoring) but it seems notable enough. I've never heard of it but it seems like a fair number of people have
[1].--CarbonRodney07:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment Any idea of a less confusing title? I thought it was going to be a biographical article, comparable to "Napoleon on Elba" or "Napoleon on St Helena".
Nyttend (
talk)
00:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment The BGG page has a few external links. I can't tell if the reviews (one in English, two in in Italian) are from RSes or not.
[2].
Hobit (
talk)
14:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Comment – is Richard Moore, the editor of the
Napoleonic Guide web site, considered a reliable source? If so, his review can be used for an additional citation to satisfy
WP:GNG. He says he is a professional journalist, so that should be sufficient. Regards,
RJH (
talk)
21:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.