The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If there is interest in developing this content toward a limited merger, I would be willing to provide a userspace copy. Vanamonde (
Talk)02:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Obviously a game just being low quality is not enough for it to be removed (see also
Vroom in the Night Sky), but I couldn't find sufficient significant coverage for any of the games; for the most part they only got an IGN review.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
20:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Save Being considered one of the worst Wii games period makes it notable. I just came across this page because I'm researching female protagonist games and have seen way more games of less notability that have pages, but I find any info on these games valuable. I would vote to keep it.
Mroddman (
talk)
23:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)reply
What about it being considered one of the worst wii games and one of a handful of wii female protagonist games? That does not make it notable?
Mroddman (
talk)
23:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete I've checked Data Design Interactive's(the game's developer) website hoping some reviews would be listed but no luck. I found 2 PDF files mentioning Trixie in Toyland + the other two games but that's it
[1],
[2]Timur9008 (
talk)
04:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)reply
I would imagine the same thing for historical facts and similar, but this is essentially a published review from a large organization. And I can't find anything that says WatchMojo is not accepted as a reliable source, but if you can find one I'll concede there. The only thing I see is that Youtube channels are generally not accepted unless it's from a large organization which WatchMojo is, but also this is a written article. I do think the WatchMojo listicle regardless confirms it's notoriety, the game does have a reputation if even if the gaming press can't be easily found now. It's definitely recognized as such in the Youtube community and other online communities.
Mroddman (
talk)
00:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)reply
This is the closest thing I can find:
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:NLISTITEM&redirect=no "Content coverage within a given article or list (i.e. whether something is noteworthy enough to be mentioned within the article or list) is governed by the principle of due weight, balance, and other content policies." It appears to me it adheres to due weight and balance policies from what I understand, though admittedly I'm not an expert on wikipedia policy.
Mroddman (
talk)
00:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.