The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article does not cite reliable sources. Relies heavily on a single, and not independent source. No significant coverage in reliable RS found. So doesn't pass
WP:GNG or
WP:POLITICIAN.
M A A Z T A L K 10:03, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Strong keep The subject is a current member of a provincial legislature and thus pass speciality notability guideline
WP:POLITICIAN. What made you say "Article does not cite reliable sources." Its amusing that the websites of KP Assembly and the Express Tribune does not deem reliable to you. Government websites are primary but are not prohibited and can be safely used for verification purpose. --
Saqib (
talk) 11:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment. I read
WP:BEFORE and yes, primary sources can be cited to support content in the article but not to establish notability. Express Tribune is definitely a reliable source but I have said in my nomination that there is no significant coverage in RS except a mention.
M A A Z T A L K 20:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
keep Again, this article clearly passes
WP:POLITICIAN, and is necessary to reduce the structural bias against non-European people on Wikipedia.
Jwslubbock (
talk) 15:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep: Elected member of provincial assembly, verified by page from that assembly. Clearly notable.
PamD 10:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.