- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (NAC) The argument that the subject has inherent notability because of the senior civil service position he holds is convincing. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 18:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- Muhammad Banaru Abubakar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO JMHamo ( talk) 23:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in th Ibrahimmb ( talk) 20:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)e list of People-related deletion discussions. sst✈ (discuss) 01:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. sst✈ (discuss) 01:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:00, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. If a permanent secretary in Nigeria is equivalent to a permanent secretary in the United Kingdom then he's probably notable, given that's a very senior civil service position (the highest rank in the civil service, in fact). -- Necrothesp ( talk) 17:00, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Comment:
Ditto a permanent secretary by status and context in Nigeria is same as that of British Government (highest civil service rank).
Seems the person is also of native traditional institution and recently deceased, notable to me
Ibrahimmb (
talk) 20:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)ibrahimmb
*Delete Sadly, no evidence of
notability.
Wikic¤l¤gy
t@lk to M£ 20:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep: per comments 197.211.52.25 ( talk) 21:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Ibrahimmb
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13( talk) 16:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13( talk) 16:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13( talk) 18:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13( talk) 18:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per Necrosthep's points. -- Rubbish computer ( Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 23:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - "He's probably notable" is not enough without the sources to back it up for a BLP. JMHamo ( talk) 00:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per @ Necrothesp: a major civil servant passes WP:NPOLITICIAN. Joseph2302 ( talk) 00:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Sub-cabinet officials (assistant secretary, commissioner, etc.) are usually considered notable per our long-standing consensus. I never noticed earlier that he was a former permanent secretary. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 07:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.