The result was keep per nominator's withdrawal. — Ed (talk • majestic titan) 01:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Writer of this article claims that the subject is a Pakistani politician, yet no evidence outside of Wikipedia can be found to assert this: 2 hits on google, both of which refer to Wikipedia, one to this article, the other to
Shabqadar - information there was added by an IP address, and simply appears to have been copied or used as an internal source to the article I've nominated.
No external news coverage, in English or Urdu anywhere, and the link to Dr Tariq Khan appears to have been an attempt at a walled garden.
Nothing special about this guy makes me think he's suitable for inclusion - Speedy declined under A7 Bio, so bringing it to the floor for some opinions. BarkingFish
Talk to me |
My contributions 10:33, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
reply
NOMINATION WITHDRAWN - Article subject IS notable, error in the source searching was due to a misspelling of his name in the article title. I hold my hands up to this one, I made a balls of it :) Suggest to closing admin - move to correct title at Mohammad Ali Khan Mohmand upon closure. BarkingFish Talk to me | My contributions 22:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Question: Is there a possibility that the lack of search hits reflects variant spellings of "Muhammad"? I am not saying this is the case, but variations should be checked, because even if this person is non-notable, I would think there should be some degree of online presence given his status. (Someone more knowledgeable than I about the subject-matter would be a better choice to do the checking.) Newyorkbrad ( talk) 21:51, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply