From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 05:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Morteza Azari (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not notable enough. It does not pass WP:GNG. -- Mhhossein talk 13:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete This is a biography of a living person that has no references. I will propose a deletion instead. CatcherStorm talk 14:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 14:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
@ Smmurphy and Necrothesp: I checked the results of the last election. He's not a member of Assembly of Experts. -- Mhhossein talk 18:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
HyperGaruda: I agree with this. -- Mhhossein talk 21:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I'll grant that based on the most recent election article he doesn't appear to be a current member of the Assembly of Experts, but that doesn't negate the possibility that he was a member of a prior session of that body. That said, in order to actually keep this per WP:NPOL we require not just an assertion that he was in the Assembly, but a reliable source which properly confirms that — especially given the evidence that this started as a copy-paste of another article about a different person, thus suggesting the possibility that it's an outright WP:HOAX. And, for that matter, even if a person does have a valid claim of notability, BLPs still have to contain sources to actually be kept. So I'm certainly willing to reconsider this if somebody can actually provide proper sourcing to confirm that he has served in the Assembly, but it has to be deleted if that can't be properly verified. Bearcat ( talk) 23:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Bearcat AFAIK, he had never been a part of the Assembly. A man with such a young age can rarely be elected for such a critical position where the applicants need to have enough experience. -- Mhhossein talk 13:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Okay, fair enough. Bearcat ( talk) 15:02, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.