The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Kurykh (
talk) 05:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The subject is not notable enough. It does not pass
WP:GNG. --
Mhhosseintalk 13:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete This is a biography of a living person that has no references. I will propose a deletion instead.
CatcherStormtalk 14:07, 1 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete Is he in the assembly of experts? Masshad would be covered in
Iranian Assembly of Experts election, 2016#Razavi Khorasan (6), and he isn't there. I can't find anything online either. But it says he is a representative of the city at the assembly, perhaps that means he is an observer?
Smmurphy(
Talk) 15:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. I'll grant that based on the most recent election article he doesn't appear to be a current member of the Assembly of Experts, but that doesn't negate the possibility that he was a member of a prior session of that body. That said, in order to actually keep this per
WP:NPOL we require not just an assertion that he was in the Assembly, but a
reliable source which properly confirms that — especially given the evidence that this started as a copy-paste of another article about a different person, thus suggesting the possibility that it's an outright
WP:HOAX. And, for that matter, even if a person does have a valid claim of notability, BLPs still have to contain sources to actually be kept. So I'm certainly willing to reconsider this if somebody can actually provide proper sourcing to confirm that he has served in the Assembly, but it has to be deleted if that can't be properly verified.
Bearcat (
talk) 23:13, 5 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Bearcat AFAIK, he had never been a part of the Assembly. A man with such a young age can rarely be elected for such a critical position where the applicants need to have enough experience. --
Mhhosseintalk 13:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.