The result was Keep. Eluchil404 ( talk) 07:47, 26 August 2012 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Not a listed building, not architecturally significant either. Only "sources" are LDS-related, which isn't independent enough of the topic. A Google Search turned up sites that were either unreliable blogs or LDS-related. Should be deleted outright, or merged to List of temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which already contains what little encyclopedic information there is about this building. p b p 14:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following additional temples for deletion. A google search has been conducted for each; each has turned up nothing notable:
p b p 15:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply