From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. As noted below, this is the wrong forum. Feel free to open a discussion at WP:RFD if you wish. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Monastery of Our Lady of Kazan (Tambov) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)


The redirect is meaningless, because the city of Tambovmonastery in this city. The separate article is possible to create ( ru:Казанский монастырь (Тамбов)), the monastery is notable for Wikipedia. I don't understand how such redirects follow the policy.

I may create a stub if the redirect will be deleted. -- Wolverène ( talk) 16:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Two things. First, this should be listed at WP:RFD as it is a redirect not an article. Second, if you can write the article, you can do so without having the redirect deleted . Just remove the redirect and write the article. --  GB  fan 17:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply
    • Hello, GB fan. I didn't know that this should be discussed at RFD because enwp is not my home project; next time I'll start in the right place. As for the second thing, I'll think about but it's more interesting to be the original author of the first edit. :) Just a point of principle, in some sense. Regards, -- Wolverène ( talk) 18:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.