The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:NCORP. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. Topic was deleted at AfD previously:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modoka. Author has continuously recreated the article different names
Modoka and
Modoka Studios without ever establishing notability. The article's references consist of a GameSpot database page with no information about the company, a GameFAQs page (unreliable source) and 2 primary sources directly from the company's website. A
reliable video game web source search for ""Modoka Studios" yields a pitiful 10 results, none of which cover the company in any depth.
The1337gamer (
talk)
19:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - the draft was moved to main by the author after an AfC submission was rightly declined due to lack of notability. I see no
admissible coverage in independent reliable sources.
Rentier (
talk)
21:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete this article. And the redirect
Modoka Studios as well. This company really is not notable, at all, there are a few mentions I see on the internet and what has been discussed above, but nothing in depth or substantial, therefore the article does not meet the policy requirements.
Ilyina Olya Yakovna (
talk)
23:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.