The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. See the news coverage listed under external links, and take a look at their owners
[1] and list of customers
[2]. This is exactly why there should not be a speedy tag for perceived spam. This company is notable, but its article might have been deleted if I hadn't found links for some press coverage.
TruthbringerToronto00:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong Speedy Delete as corporate spam after reading TruthbringerToronto's backup evidence. Speedy Tag for Corporate Spam is an excellent idea - isn't there one already
Bwithh02:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.