Wikipedia:articles For Deletion Minister Mauricelm X

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Minister Mauricelm X

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person doesn't seem to actually exist; I can't find any reliable sources that actually mention them. In addition, some of the information is incorrect, such as him organizing the Black Coffee Party (which he didn't organize). RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 22:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Redirect to African American Defense League, the barely notable organization he founded. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 03:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 03:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom; lack of sources indicates failing WP:GNG. Ifnord ( talk) 04:09, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Redirect to African American Defense League per Malik Shabazz. Individual doesn't seem notable and seems to fail WP:GNG, but it's a reasonable search term, so redirecting to the organization is fine. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 06:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Delete Lack of significant coverage and sources. Shellwood ( talk) 12:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Delete. There's a potential notability claim here as founder of an activist group, but that's not an inclusion freebie that exempts him from having to be reliably sourced to media coverage. But there's exactly none here, and I can't locate any on Google either — literally all I can find is blogs and social networking posts and fake-news sites. Bearcat ( talk) 15:17, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Delete The article on his violence agitating group goes into enough detail on his calls to kill police officers, which is somehow neglected in this article. On the other hand the reference to Malik Shabazz in this article is a bit odd considering Shabazz was killed by agents of the Nation of Islam because of his renouncing of their breed of hatred and embracing a more inclusivist view of humanity. The article as is lacks sources. I have to admit that I am less than convinced that Mauricelm's group is notable, but he is certainly not notable enough for a stand alone article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:40, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Note that I added a search bar under the name in use by press and NGOs: "Mauricelm-Lei Millere" Editors who commented above can easily find sources using this name, albeit not a great many. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 20:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Redirect to the very small (vanishingly small - it may amount to little more than just him) African American Defense League which he founded and where his limited notability is. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 20:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Delete - I'd normally say redirect, but I'm not sure the organization itself would survive an AfD, so why bother. Not even close to meeting WP:GNG, as per the arguments noted above regarding sourcing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Delete - per nom. This article does not meet the threshold of WP:GNG. - Ventric ( talk) 02:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.