The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines.
Davewild (
talk) 18:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: Someone offer him a capital letter for his last name, please. I assume he's not e.e. cummings. The article has local press references, but it also offers nebulous material (programs for housing the homeless. . . and these are of what sort? as one doubts that he's truly the only county politician to make proposals along those lines). A local pol. who isn't being discussed for statewide office yet.
Hithladaeus (
talk) 19:32, 8 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete routine local press only, and no reason to expect anything more. DGG (
talk ) 19:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep: Santa Clara County is the Capitol of Silicon Valley and home to 2 million residents which makes local government office a bigger deal than in some other areas. All 4 other Board of Supervisor members have been allowed to have pages, following the same Wikipedia guidelines. This page completes a missing piece.
See
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. All four of those people make some other claim of notability, separate from the Santa Clara County council, that satisfies a different notability criterion. Their presence doesn't extend a notability freebie to other colleagues who can't make their own standalone claim to satisfying one of our inclusion rules on their own steam.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:57, 13 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. He clearly fails
WP:POLITICIAN, which makes no allowance for members of county boards of supervisors regardless of the size of the county. That leaves
WP:GNG, but all I could find in a search was routine local coverage. The references on the page consist of two listings at the county government site, one campaign website, one op-ed written BY him, and one interview by a nonprofit organization whose cause he sympathizes with. In other words not a single Independent Reliable Source. --
MelanieN (
talk) 16:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.