The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Mike Parker (California politician) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, parked on a single primary source with no evidence of reliable source coverage, of a person "notable" only as a withdrawn candidate in a mayoral election. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 03:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Absolutely no claim to notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete - This could have been run through PROD quite easily. Withdrawn mayoral candidate, not even close to a GNG pass. Carrite ( talk) 02:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete fails WP:NPOL unelected, non-notable Kraxler ( talk) 17:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete doesn't meet either WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.