The result was keep. per WP:SNOW The Wordsmith Communicate 18:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The article for this unreleased book (an alternative version of Twilight (novel)) does not contain enough non-trivial mentions from independent sources, thus failing WP:NBOOKS and WP:GNG. If one of the sources cited here is not from the author's website, then it is from an interview in which the subject matter is only mentioned in passing. However, this incident is clearly worth a mention, but the information would be better off at Twilight (novel) or Twilight (series). I advise participants of this discussion to observe WP:ITSA; the article should not be kept simply because it is relating to the Twilight franchise. KingOfTheMedia ( talk) 17:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply