- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Michelle A. Harris ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough to warrant own article...information may be moved more usably to Political history of Chicago. smileguy91 talk - contribs 03:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.
Everymorning
(talk) 03:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- KEEP She's a current Alderman, and heads the Chicago City Council's powerful rules committee. She's notable enough for the Chicago Tribune, Chicago Sun-Times, NBC News, WTTW. Victor Grigas ( talk) 04:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Chicago is an internationally famous global city, which is the rarefied "elite" class of cities in which we do accept the city council as an office that satisfies WP:NPOL — while it's certainly true that not all of her colleagues actually have articles yet, by far the majority do. The article definitely needs some improvement, I won't argue with that — but it already isn't entirely unsourced, further sourceability is definitely attainable, and a valid claim of notability is present. Keep and flag for improvement. Bearcat ( talk) 22:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:18, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I think any modern Chicago alderman would satisfy the GNG with ease. (And even for 19th century aldermen, I would bet that significant material exists in print.) Victor Grigas has already shared some of the sources that are available in this specific case. A proper article on the political history of Chicago would be too broad to include biographies on any individual aldermen, so a merge is not a good idea. Zagalejo ^^^ 06:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.