- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Micheal Chatellier ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Individual does not meet the notability threshold for an article. Running for office does not establish notability. ALPolitico ( talk) 00:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Plainly fails WP:GNG. I can't find third-party coverage about this ex-general considering a political career. Pichpich ( talk) 04:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Being an unelected candidate for office does not get a person into Wikipedia by itself — and he isn't even that yet, but is merely a candidate in a party primary, and that counts for even less. Plus the article is completely unsourced, and reads far more like a campaign brochure than an encyclopedia article — and even an actual senator doesn't get to keep that kind of article, let alone an unelected candidate. Bearcat ( talk) 09:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there are not even any minimally convincing sources and thus also any other signs to suggest the applicable general notability for politicians. SwisterTwister talk 23:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.