The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Puffy article on pollster that fails
WP:GNG. Has run for public office, but that's insufficient under
WP:POLITICIAN. After I nominated this for deletion, I learned that the article was previously deleted in an AfD and improperly re-created by an SPA. I have tagged for speedy deletion.
Coretheapple (
talk)
16:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment The article starts off the same, but has extra information (which isn't surprising, considering it's seven years since the previous version). I can't see, however, that this version is much of an improvement. I'm leaving the speedy tag on, as while I'm not sure about speedying it, someone else might be able to make up their mind.
Peridon (
talk)
20:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.