- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Michael W. Koontz ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. Claim of notability is not inherited from office they ran for. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO. reddogsix ( talk) 16:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- @ Reddogsix: You're at least the fourth person who thinks that by removing an A7 tag, I'm implying inherited notability. Anyone who thinks that doesn't understand A7 properly. A7's standard is lower than notability. Adam9007 ( talk) 16:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete A perennial candidate for political office who has consistently received a tiny percentage of the votes. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 18:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 18:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 18:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Clear cut case.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.