- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 02:52, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- Michael Britton ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN scope_creep talk 21:34, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:17, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- As usual, unelected candidates for office do not qualify for Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, per WP:NPOL. And even if he wins election in October he still wouldn't qualify for inclusion here, because St. Catharines (pop. ~130K) is not in the narrow range of internationally famous metropolitan megacities for which we actually extend notability to the city councillors. Plus for bonus points, the article is entirely unsourced — and as I've said all too frequently of late, I have a significant tendency to suspect conflict of interest editing by the campaign manager when a brochure about an unelected candidate shows up as its creator's first-ever contribution to Wikipedia. Delete with fire. Bearcat ( talk) 23:20, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A clear-cut case. -- Mkativerata ( talk) 01:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Per the excellent argument by Bearcat. The one source is primary, so there is not sufficient indication of notability. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 13:10, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.