From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nom hasn't even bothered to search....So closing as SK (non-admin closure)Davey2010 Talk 01:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Michael Beesley (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed parliamentary candidate. Uhooep ( talk) 03:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Keep — There are a variety of factors that would justify the article's inclusion: (1) Beesley received a CBE, which satisfies WP:ANYBIO as a distinguished commendation, (2) an award bears his name, reflecting his status as one of the "most influential transport economists of his time" ( University of Leeds), (3) the awarding institution certainly appears to be international in scope: Thredbo/University of Sydney Business School, (4) he received obituaries in a journal ( Transport Reviews) and at least one national paper ( The Guardian); the latter describing him as among "the most gifted industrial economists of his time", and (5) he also had a series of lectures in his honour: The Beesley Lectures, at the Institute of Economic Affairs. Losing in a parliamentary election wouldn't trump the above indicators of his notability. The Origins of Heaven ( talk) 04:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 06:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 06:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.