The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand(
talk) 01:32, 12 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:MILNG. Being the last of something doesn't make for notability. Is being a scout for Patton notable? The article on Patton makes one very slight mention of his having scout units. Nothing more.
...William 13:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete, subject only appears to have received significant coverage in articles/obituaries about the subject's death. Therefore, even if those obituaries the subject is only notable for a single event and falls under
WP:BIO1E, and as that event is the subject's death, and the death itself isn't notable the criteria set forth in
WP:EVENT, this article then falls under
WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Nothing against the service of the subject, however, the subject does not appear to be notable
WP:SOLDIER, meeting none of the criteria set forth within it.--
RightCowLeftCoast (
talk) 14:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. Photo on front page and a substantial write-up in a newspaper
here, but he does not appear to pass guidelines at
WP:SOLDIER. I also found other local newspaper hits giving what would be routine coverage to his duties as mayor, etc. -21:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
While that does appear to be
significant coverage, it doesn't appear to be enough to meet
WP:GNG, as it is but one non-primary or secondary reliable source.--
RightCowLeftCoast (
talk) 06:11, 8 November 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.