- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Melinda Smith Bowman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Magnolia677 ( talk) 20:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: agree. Although I like that she is a Republican she does not meet threshold of political notability for a standalone page. Just too soon. Quis separabit? 20:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete politicians of this level do not gain notability from the office alone and there is not enough coverage to pass GNG. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 18:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 18:22, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The subject is an elected county clerk. (U.S.) county officials are not usually kept (per WP:POLOUTCOMES) and if so, would need to meet WP:GNG. The sourcing of this article (in its present state) include one reference to election results and the subject's campaign website. -- Enos733 ( talk) 22:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC) minor edited -- Enos733 ( talk) 15:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.