The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 19:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Meister Cook (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by IP. Non-notable business where the claim to fame seems to be that it has appeared in Inc's list of growing businesses. This doesn't confer the depth of coverage needed by WP:ORGDEPTH and there isn't substantial coverage in other sources that we typically expect for businesses to meet WP:GNG. TonyBallioni ( talk) 00:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete -- just a promo blurb. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.