The result was delete. JForget 01:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC) reply
I never like taking purely "bad" articles to AFD, it not being cleanup and all, but this one warrants it I fear.
In short, it's a violation of WP:NPOV. Unreferenced and full of statements of an entirely dubious nature, it tries to take an entirely arbitrary period (is 450AD medieval anyway?), then pick out selections. The result is not good.
I realise that this comes close to the definition "AFD is not cleanup", and if you think that the article could be made a go of, that it is better to have something than nothing even if the something risks completely mi-portraying events, then I would not be surprised. But needless to say, I disagree. - Jarry1250 Humorous? Discuss. 16:51, 18 July 2010 (UTC) - Jarry1250 Humorous? Discuss. 16:51, 18 July 2010 (UTC) reply