The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable author. a large number of references provided (or at least, formatted as references) but as far as I can tell they are all either self-published or contain only trivial mentions of the article subject. The excessive amount of inane personal biographical information seems designed to cover the basic fact that this author is non-notable.
Jdcooper (
talk)
23:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete No sourcing found for the author, not very much of anything found. Sources used are orange or red, or not registering for reliability. Rather extensive PROMO it seems.
Oaktree b (
talk)
02:47, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per sources identified. Always open to rewrite for improving articles but keep in mind if a reasonable source published details, then that is the level of mention in Wikipedia, not arbitrary decisions in Wikipedia culture of what to include (i say culture vs policies because individuals may decide what they personally want to include but policy is another matter.)
Smkolins (
talk)
11:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.