The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC) reply

May Chiu (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person whose only reliably sourced claim of notability is having been a non-winning candidate for federal and provincial office. As always, merely being a candidate in an election that the person didn't win is not a notability claim that passes WP:NPOL, and neither is being the first candidate of any particular ethnic background (and even then she isn't even the first in the province's history, but merely the first in the history of one particular party, which is even weaker as a notability claim). But there's no sourcing here to get her past WP:GNG for her work as a lawyer or community activist. All of which means that nothing here is a valid reason for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat ( talk) 23:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 23:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 23:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.