This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 November 9. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. I have completely discounted the SPA and IP votes. Appears to be a BLP without RS. The delete arguments are therefore the policy based ones and coincide with community expectations concerning the requirement for BLPs to have RS. Spartaz Humbug! 04:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Recreation of article deleted at WP:Articles for deletion/Max Kaur from a WP:SPA. The article name has been changed in an apparent attempt to escape watchlists. No reason for the DAB qualifier other than evading people watching the article. Additional reference has been added that does not appear to mention him but most of the article is behind a paywall. noq ( talk) 01:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC) reply