- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Maverick Rowan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBASKETBALL, a case of WP:TOOSOON —usernamekiran (talk) 11:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GNG. There are already two-three legit sources on the article and a Google Search shows more exist. Rikster2 ( talk) 11:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Subject was a very good player for a top college basketball program. He is notable no matter what happens in the NBA draft Rogermx ( talk) 19:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Meets GNG with sources, NBA Draft potential is irrelevent. ~ EDDY ( talk/ contribs)~ 23:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Sufficient evidence of notability. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 00:29, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.