The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Strong Keep Google is not a measure of credibility for a NGO working with the rural urban poor of a 3rd world country with a 1% internet penetration rate! Besides, did you google its name in Hindi? The other 500 Indian languages? Systemic bias, anyone? - CrazyRussiantalk/
contribs/
email14:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep 77 unique ghits for a non-profit, non-western, non-latin-alphabet organization seem like a fair count. Judging the org by its alexa-rank is a bit silly really. --
Eivindt@c16:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. Have expanded based on website at bottom of page and minimal Google research. Didn't have to try very hard to find this stuff: nominator perhaps judged on web-penetration rather than on contents.
JackyR17:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Strong keep. Have been ordered by some lunatic person ;) to follow up the Indian end on foot, snail mail etc. Yes, sir. will be done as ordered! Regards, AshLin
Sorry, didnt intend to mean it that way. You'll find my back trail full of attempted puns|broken pottery by this bull in the Wikipedia China shop (there I go again). Just a (sick) attempt at humour. Strong keep because, in India, we have very few social service organisations as per density of our populace. An organisation such as Matru Seva Sangh reflects the Indian nationalist effort of the early twenties at following Gandhian ideals in the service of mankind. I think I'll send crzr an apology barnstar so that I'll have at least twenty gaffes more in interacting with him to my credit and I can rest in peace. BTW, I dont normally get involved outside butterflies unless I plan to get actively involved in the article.Hence strong keep since I plan to work on this for a couple of months.
AshLin02:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.