The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article is extremely non-neutral and is really an opinion piece rather than a formal neutral encyclopedic article. It cannot readily be fixed.
Blowing it up and stubbifying it would be acceptable in place of deletion.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
03:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as I concur this is simply a journal report and certainly not an encyclopedia article, nor will it be because it's not a subject to suggest enough for its own article, instead better at an overall health article.
SwisterTwistertalk03:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete While we do have a few "Maternal health in (country)" articles, we don't cover sub-national regions and even if we did this article is nowhere near acceptable for various reasons already mentioned in other opinions above.
Roger (Dodger67) (
talk)
11:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Please move to draft space This article is being developed during a class in the
Wikipedia Education Program. I talked with the instructor in the course who asked if this might be moved to draft space for reflection. Could this deletion discussion be halted and this made a draft?
Blue Rasberry (talk)21:45, 9 October 2016 (UTC)reply
As Blue Rasberry mentioned, this is a student article that shouldn't have been created in mainspace. While it has issues in its current form, I'd like to userfy and work with Land and the student to try to get it into something acceptable.
Ian (Wiki Ed) (
talk)
23:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.