The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 11:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Massimo Guglielmo Pedrazzini (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no reason to think notable; no special professional honours, minor publications only DGG ( talk ) 07:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Article lacks reliable sources. Could not find any reliable sources. Depth of coverage for Massimo Guglielmo Pedrazzini lacking. Knox490 ( talk) 11:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:09, 16 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete – After several searches, not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.