The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton |
Talk 03:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)reply
She is a regional representative to a state school board . Such positions do not lead to the assumption of notability. DGG (
talk ) 05:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Represents eleven parishes on state Board of Education. Qualifies as regional political office. Same with above members who represent multiple parishes as well.
Billy Hathorn (
talk) 12:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete.
Low-level politician (on state school board) is not sufficient for automatic notability (which I don't believe in anyway). Either way there are no sources that assert this subject's remarkability, as also reflected in its lack of sources. czar 14:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The story is in progress for the November 21 election
Billy Hathorn (
talk) 15:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC) and has been refurbished.
Billy Hathorn (
talk) 20:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: Coverage now includes four newspapers, a magazine, a radio station, and two television stations thus far.
Billy Hathorn (
talk) 16:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak keep or userfy: I have evaluated each source currently cited in the article. Ignoring the Secretary of State, facebook and other sources that could not demonstrate notability in any case (and skipping the Google Drive source since Drive crashes my browser), here's what I found for the media sources:
Shreveport Times obituary — Clearly submitted to the paper by someone with COI and run in exchange for payment; ignored.
Shreveport Times article — Another that's more than a mere mention, yet somewhat less than substantial.
Tallying up the sources, I'm inclined toward keeping the article, even though it's an edge case for notability. A fair amount of work has gone into the article, and given the contentiousness of the fight over Common Core in Louisiana it seems likely there will be future substantial coverage of Harris in that regard. This may be a case of
WP:TOOSOON. If the article is not kept in mainspace, I advocate for it to be userfied rather than simply deleted, and am willing to take it on in my own user space if article creator
Billy Hathorn doesn't want to. —
GrammarFascistcontribstalk 16:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete Local coverage of a school board member is not acceptable for inclusion in a global encyclopaedia.
AusLondonder (
talk) 22:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)reply
AusLondonder, this is not a local-level school board but the school board at the state level; members are responsible for policy decisions that affect the entire state, and each represent a region within the state, not merely a local municipality. Did you perhaps misunderstand what Harris's position actually is? —
GrammarFascistcontribstalk 21:41, 11 November 2015 (UTC)reply
I still do not believe Johnson Harris is notable on the scale necessary for a global encyclopaedia.
AusLondonder (
talk) 21:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment. With so much coverage from multiple sources, this article could also qualify as local politician under the notability guideline though she is a regional figure. There is a place on Wikiepdia for "local politicians": it says so specifically in the rules. I have seen many British and Australian "local politicians" on the board too.
Billy Hathorn (
talk) 01:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC) 2. Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. is the specific line in the rules.
Billy Hathorn (
talk) 11:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)reply
KeepWhy is this here? I'm of the opinion that before an article even gets to AfD some ought to check them first. If GrammarFascist can find that much info and as Billy Hathorn stated, "major local political figures who have received significant press coverage", it shouldn't be here... or is this just another case of no one willing to take the time to do a rewrite?! --
MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 17:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Seems so. I'm withdrawing the AfD, but someone else will have to close it, as there are other deletes than my own. DGG (
talk ) 22:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.