The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Mary Ann Lutz (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. I do see a few articles in the Pasadena Star News and a few minor mentions in the Los Angeles Times, but nothing that I think establishes GNG. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 21:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 21:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 21:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete Fails WP:NPOL. Also fails WP:BASIC. All coverage is trivial. AusLondonder ( talk) 03:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Monrovia CA is not large enough to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability under WP:NPOL just because they exist — but the referencing here is 85 per cent primary sources and blogs with just one piece of routine local coverage in the local media about the election results for reliable sourcing, which is nowhere near enough to get her over WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat ( talk) 23:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete, I think. There is one piece where she is described and even quoted, but it's really just about an election, not her. And that seems to be it, at least as currently in the article. WP:BIO want's multiple in-depth pieces. Monrovia has 40,000 people so it's not Podunk, but still... not large enough to presume that being mayor is enough, I don't don't think. Falls into the Just Another Accomplished Person category I think. Herostratus ( talk) 22:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.