From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to draft. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle

Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Until it is confirmed by Ubisoft or Nintendo, this game is simply a rumour. All these "leaks" may be fake. We'll find out at E3, but until then this game is only a rumour and should not be stated as fact. See WP:RUMOUR. Geesi ( talk) 09:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Comicbook.com already verified the authenticity of the leak with their Ubisoft sources: [1]. Multiple reliable video game sources say the game the is real and there are enough details to begin an article. Regardless, if the consensus is that there should not be a mainspace article yet, then I have no problem with it being moved to draftspace in the meantime. -- The1337gamer ( talk) 17:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move to draft - Despite it being almost certainly true, the game hasn't been officially announced by Ubisoft, so why are we changing the way we normally handle leaks like this? Verifying a leak doesn't make the game official, at least to normal Wikipedia guidelines. ~ Dissident93 ( talk) 17:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move to draft - It's a rumor, we shouldn't have an article about it yet, but there's also far too much corroborating information to believe this is not going to happen (particularly with E3 weeks away). We can't talk about it in mainspace, but drafting it for now (since there are RSes discussing the rumor) and then moving back to mainspace when a formal announcement happens is fine. -- MASEM ( t) 19:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move to draft: per Masem. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 13:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move to draft baring an extremely elaborate hoax this will almost certainly be announced soon, likely during E3 in mid June and can be moved back then.-- 64.229.167.158 ( talk) 02:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Move to draft. There is no deadline, so it doesn't need to be an article yet. This rumor is basically confirmed by everyone except the company that we need it confirmed from to actually have an article, which is why none of us (so far) have voted "delete". Gestrid ( talk) 01:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.