The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
WP:BLP of an activist, which is resting mostly on
unreliable sourcing — of the four references here, #2 and #4 are gutted as
blogsourcing, while #1 glancingly namechecks her existence in the process of failing to be about her. #3 ain't so bad, admittedly — she's not the primary topic of the article, but she features in it prominently enough for it to be worth something — but one decent source isn't enough to get a person over
WP:GNG by itself if all of the other sources are blogs and namechecks. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if an improved volume of good sourcing shows up.
Bearcat (
talk)
03:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.