The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not dying for an incredible amount of time does make someone notable and creation of articles on every world's-oldest should be encouraged.LE (
talk)
17:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete This article blatantly fails
WP:GNG,
WP:BIO1E, and
WP:NOPAGE. There is no policy that the "oldest x" is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like she only visited a hospital once, had a child born on Christmas and her taste in food. Her name, life dates, and nationality are best handled on the six lists they already reside on. This
WP:PERMASTUB is not needed.
Newshunter12 (
talk)
03:13, 24 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Unlike those campaigning against articles about supercentenarians copying their "reasons" from one page to another, I am voting delete in this case because I find very little coverage of this individual. Some on her 115th birthday, but not (as far as I can see), sustained over more than just a few months, not in-depth, and no evidence of participation in books or documentaries or other activities that would indicate that she became widely known.
RebeccaGreen (
talk)
11:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.