The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:35, 14 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Marek Vašut (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability: significant RS coverage cannot be found. Article tagged "Notabiity" since 2008. K.e.coffman ( talk) 18:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Was prodded with a rationale that he "Appears to be an actor of minor notability in native language, but not in English." There's plenty of Czech coverage available from a Google search, and as I stated when I deprodded it, "if he's notable in any language, he's notable full stop". -- Michig ( talk) 18:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

I came across this article via CAT:NN. The sources, if available, have not demonstrated themselves in eight years; that's why I nominated the article for deletion. K.e.coffman ( talk) 18:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep yes there's a lot of significant coverage on Gnews. And Google Translate makes reading it a snap. He appears to be more notable now as a game show moderator. But he is notable nonetheless. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 21:14, 6 August 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep per Michig above and per obvous lack of competence by the nominator (being notable in native language sources is enough to pass WP:N). Among other things, the Czech version of the article shows Vašut having entries on several printed encyclopedias [1]. As noted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13th Child (3rd nomination), in a few hours the nominator started/voted for deletion in about 200 AfD, boldly redirected dozens of articles with the rationale "non notable on its own since 2008" and prodded dozens of others, generally spending one minute per article. If his carefulness is the same he showed here and elsewhere, a topic ban could be necessary. Cavarrone 13:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Keep - Article is clearly important. Also, I agree with Cavarrone that this user should be topic banned. Infact, I thing that an investigation should be launched to see if these editor's edits are automated, because they seem to be. Ethanlu121 ( talk) 20:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.