The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Michig (
talk) 09:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Article without references, eliminated
in the lusophone Wikipedia. In short, Brazilian activist, pre-candidate for political positions, but nothing. Notoriety not evidenced. Le Comte Edmond Dantèsmsg 04:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Being president of an organization, even a notable one, is not an automatic notability pass that entitles a person to keep an unsourced
WP:BLPseparately from already having his name mentioned in the organization's article anyway — he would have to clear
WP:GNG on the depth and quality of
reliable sourcing, but there isn't any here: the only "source" is a Q&A interview on a
Blogspot blog, which is not a reliable or notability-assisting source for both Q&A and Blogspot reasons. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can actually source him much better than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete interviews do not show notability, and that is the only source.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 02:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.