The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. It has been demonstrated and there is consensus that the topic does not meet either
WP:PROF or
WP:GNG, with no in-depth sources provided to confer notability. —
Amakuru (
talk)
11:43, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Distinct lack of third-party reliable sources cited, possible autobiography (or possibly just based on one). It's possible more and better sources exist in Italian, but considering the subject's article was deleted from itwiki, that seems unlikely.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?18:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Hi @
HJ Mitchell, I hope I can give you a few insights on who is Marcello Minenna and his career.
Minenna is a renowned economist, author of 100+ papers, whose contributions in this field were quoted by many scholars and academics, both Italian and international. He is also quoted within en wikipedia's pages.
I contributed on both pages; actually the Italian page has been deleted following POV pushes (both defamatory and celebratory) and edit wars, mainly in the paragraph about judicial controversy. The same paragraph here was subject to POV and vandalism. Btw the same day of the deletion an article in an Italian newspaper was published
[1] that states that Minenna was "kicked off" by Wikipedia. It is clear that WP kicks off nobody.
My intention is to rewrite Minenna's page shortly. In fact, according to Italian guidelines, notability derives for example directly from his regular activity as columnist on the front page of the main Italian economic newspaper. The page had been on itwiki for many years (here since 2011). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Michelino12 (
talk •
contribs)
16:47, 18 May 2023 (UTC)reply
I have created the page at the end of 2011. Let me firstly anticipate that Minenna has definitely an encyclopedic profile according to wikipedias' guidelines.
WP:AUTHOR requirements are satisfied since he writes regularly on
IlSole24ore on the first page and on
Financial Times.
WP:PROFESSOR also since his reseraches are largely cited and also recalled here on several WP pages.
It is not a case that the article has been on WP since 2011 until now.
Unfortunately by looking at the modifications overtime I realised that the page has been vandalised and ruined in several aspects. There are several unregistered users that damage the discussions and the article.
Delete. Anemic citation record does not rise to the level of
WP:PROF notability. None of the accomplishments touted in such extravagent detail in the article look particularly noteworthy. And we have no sources that would pass
WP:GNG or verify those accomplishments: nothing that is in-depth, reliably published, and independent of the subject. The parade of single-purpose accounts on view in this AfD (one of whom claims to be the same as long-inactive SPA
Olive75 (
talk·contribs), who created the article) and the parade of even more SPAs on view in the article history also does not make a convincing case for notability (somewhat the opposite). —
David Eppstein (
talk)
06:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.