- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Manvel Mamoyan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article whose claim to fame are obscure Guinness World Records. Non notable individual. PRehse ( talk) 11:06, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 13:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 13:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 13:07, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Guinness World Records is a reliable source. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 13:52, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- But does not confer notability. PRehse ( talk) 14:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Harut111 ( talk) 15:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete passing references does not add up to notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:09, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the article does not contain promotional elements and is strictly based on references stated above. The article presents Mamoyan's biography and activities, rather than his fame. -- XenonX88 ( talk) 07:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, to my mind, 3 Guinness World Records certificate bring notability-- Armineaghayan ( talk) 07:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I believe a relist is legitimate given there is reasonable dispute other whether Guiness records provide notability
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear ( talk) 09:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: I believe a relist is legitimate given there is reasonable dispute other whether Guiness records provide notability
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear ( talk) 09:55, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.