The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 00:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Manmohan Vaidya (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:POLITICIAN. - Vivvt ( Talk) 13:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter¹²³ (palaver) 17:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 01:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete. A political party's campaign chair could qualify for a Wikipedia article on WP:GNG grounds if he could be reliably sourced to a significant degree of media coverage — but he's not automatically entitled to one just because he exists, and one news article is not enough sourcing to get him over the bar. Bearcat ( talk) 18:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment – The Google news link above provides several news articles about the subject. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.